For about seven years now, we have seen a man by the name of Batista in the WWE. He got his start with D-Von Dudley as a "deacon" during Dudley's minister gimmick. Not a good gimmick, but none the less he did have it.
Batista really had nowhere to go after Dudley moved away from the gimmick and the WWE couldn't use him on SmackDown! much anymore.
Then, we saw him make his way to WWE RAW, where he joined the now infamous faction, Evolution. The stable was made up of the legendary Ric Flair, the young, talented upstart Randy Orton, the Animal Batista, and the Game Triple H.
They started making RAW a living hell for all. They dominated the entire brand and won every single title on the show: the Tag Team, Intercontinental, and of course the World Heavyweight Title.
We saw Triple H dominate like always and basically use this group to elevate himself, but that didn't sit well with Orton or even Batista. Orton left the group first, then Batista saw the light.
From there, we saw him win multiple World Titles, even taking the World Heavyweight titlefrom Triple H, before going to SmackDown!. He has dominated up until this day in the WWE, and the entire time he has been a big, muscular man.
This was something that people wondered about. We saw this big guy who looked like he had to be “on” something.
Now, as many people know, the WWE will suspend or even release steroid users, no matter how popular they are in the company.
They do not want this cloud hovering around them anymore, and we all know Vince McMahon does not want to go on trial again. So its either him or the ‘roid abuser, and who do you think Vinny Mac is going to pick? HIMSELF (and his company), obviously.
So if Batista was on something, a suspension could be handed down or even a release could come. Neither has ever happened to Batista.
Many think that because there has never been any documented discipline to Batista, the WWE is actually covering up suspensions by making up an "injury" so he could leave.
People also think that that Batista's absences have been caused by actual injuries, but are because of steroid use.
They cite his torn triceps, which happened twice before to him, as a common injury among steroid users, whose disproportionate muscle mass overloads tendons.
Once, he tore his triceps was during a match at the March 1, 2003 live event in Reading, Pennsylvania.
Then, a few weeks later during rehab, he re-tore it "in a freak accident while jogging with his wife," according to wwe.com. Because of this, Batista would be sidelined until October of ‘03.
It just seemed too weird; who the hell tears a triceps while jogging? It would have to be a truly freak accident, like they were hit by a semi-truck or something.
Now, because it was still not in the best shape at the time, his triceps was easily able to be torn again. So, even if it was just some common, daily activity involving the triceps, and nothing too hard on them, the injury could still be aggravated.
So, we cannot jump to conclusions and say it was just a story to hide the real truth.
Many think it is just bad luck for Batista that he keeps hurting himself and is out for long periods of time with them.http://bleacherreport.com
No comments:
Post a Comment